Key points at a glance
- The best topics come from real questions from your clients, not from the professional press.
- One question per article, the answer in the first sentences, the details afterwards.
- Expert articles are general information, not individual advice; a short notice and an as-of date belong in them.
- Link every article to the matching practice area page, and show who wrote it.
- Better one good article a month that is maintained than ten quick texts that go out of date. AI texts only with professional review.
This post is general information, not legal or tax advice for your individual case. Laws, professional guidelines and chamber fees change: check the details with your chamber, the relevant authority or your professional association before you make a decision.
Why expert articles work for professional firms
People looking for a firm often are not searching for a firm at all. They are searching for their problem: “Kündigung erhalten was tun” (received notice of dismissal, what now), “Pendlerpauschale Homeoffice” (commuter allowance and working from home), “Vorsorgevollmacht notariell nötig” (does a lasting power of attorney need a notary), “Jahresabschluss Frist GmbH” (annual accounts deadline for a limited company). The home page and the pages on your practice areas match such searches only to a limited extent. An expert article that answers exactly this question can. Anyone who finds an understandable answer there and realises their case is more complicated is more likely to call the firm that has just helped them.
There is a second effect: expert articles show competence without advertising. For professions with strict advertising rules, this is the most obvious way to become visible. Factual information about legal and tax questions is permitted in all six professions, and notaries too may inform about publications and topics that affect many people. AI assistants also draw on well-structured, verifiable answers when they describe or recommend a firm.
Topics from real client questions
The best list of topics is in your inbox and in your phone notes. Questions you answer every week are also being searched for on Google. Keep a simple list in which the whole team enters questions, without names and without details of the case. After a month you will have more topics than you can write about.
| Profession | Typical question | Possible article |
|---|---|---|
| Lawyer | Do I have to pay tax on my severance payment? | Severance pay on dismissal: what is left net, what to watch out for |
| Tax adviser | Can I deduct my home office? | Working from home and home offices: what you can deduct |
| Certified bookkeeper | How long do I have to keep receipts? | Retention periods for receipts, separately for Austria and Germany |
| Mediator | What does mediation cost, and who pays? | How mediation works during a separation, and what it costs |
| Auditor | Does my limited company need an audit? | Audit requirement: from what size the accounts must be audited |
| Notary | Do I need a notary for a lasting power of attorney? | Lasting power of attorney: when notarisation or certification makes sense |
Check each topic briefly: what do people type in about it? Google's autocomplete suggestions and the “People also ask” box show the wording people use in everyday life. Clients write “Unterhalt Kind wie viel” (child maintenance how much), not “Kindesunterhaltsbemessung” (assessment of child maintenance). Use this language in the heading and first sentence. Where terms differ between the countries, such as Lohnverrechnung and Lohnbuchhaltung (payroll) or Klient:in and Mandant:in (client), write for your country or name both.
One question, one article: the structure
Legal texts often build up from the general to the conclusion. Readers online do not have that patience. They want to know within two sentences whether they are in the right place. This structure has proven itself:
A question as the heading
A concrete question or a clear topic, worded the way clients search. No wordplay, no case number. One question per article; related questions get their own articles.
The answer first
The first two or three sentences give the short answer, with the most important qualification: “As a rule, yes, if …”. Anyone who reads only this is still better informed.
Details in short sections
Then requirements, deadlines, exceptions and examples, each with a subheading. Where Austria and Germany have different rules, separate the sections visibly.
What to do now
A short section with practical steps: which documents should be ready, by when action must be taken, when advice makes sense.
Notice, as-of date and contact
One sentence saying that the article provides general information and does not replace advice, the as-of date and a link to the practice area page or to the contact page.

There is no rule for length. An article is as long as the question requires: a deadline can be explained in 400 words, a business handover perhaps in 2,000. Filler words and repetition do not make a text easier to find. Tables for deadlines and amounts, lists for documents and an example with invented figures help more than long paragraphs.
Information, not individual advice
An expert article is addressed to everyone and knows no individual case. It should say so, too. A short notice at the end is enough, for example: “This article provides general information and does not replace advice in an individual case. As of: March 2026.” It does not protect against every form of liability, but it makes clear what the text is. More important than the notice is that the text itself is sound: name exceptions, do not write “always” where “as a rule” is correct, and separate the legal position by country.
How to get it right
- Use examples with invented names and figures
- Cite judgments with court, date and case number, and briefly put them in context
- Present the legal position in Austria and Germany separately
- Stay factual, even if a topic annoys you
Better avoid
- Describe real matters, not even “anonymised” with recognisable details
- Promise success or highlight results from your own cases
- Use titles or specialisations that have not been awarded
- Copy other people's professional articles in full or in long passages
With a blog, the website also becomes an editorial service. In Germany you then name a responsible person under § 18 (2) MStV (Interstate Media Treaty); in Austria, instead of the short disclosure, a full disclosure including the basic editorial line under § 25 MedienG may become necessary. The details are in the guides to mandatory information, for example for lawyers in Austria and tax advisers in Germany.
Show the date, keep articles up to date
An article on the commuter allowance from three years ago is worse than none: it gives old amounts and makes the firm look careless. So show visibly below every article when it was published and when it was last reviewed. Google recommends labelling the date clearly and giving the same date in the structured data (datePublished and dateModified).
- Only update when something really changes: a new date without a change in content misleads readers and achieves nothing on Google.
- Note upcoming changes in the law: when a reform has been passed, note which articles are affected and revise them for when it comes into force.
- Annual review: once a year, check all articles containing amounts, thresholds and deadlines, ideally at the turn of the year for tax and bookkeeping topics.
- Merge outdated content: three similar articles on the same topic are better as one maintained article; redirect the old addresses to the new one.
Internal links to your practice areas
Expert articles bring visitors to the website, and the pages on your practice areas turn them into enquiries. Connect the two. Every article links in the text to the matching page, for example “More about our advice on employment law”, and every practice area page links to the two or three most important articles on it. Use descriptive link texts instead of “click here”; Google uses the link text to understand the target.
How practice area pages are structured is described in the guide Practice areas on the firm website, and how content and structure work together in the article on local SEO for professional firms. Check how your article will look in the search results before publishing with the Google preview.
Show who is writing
Google speaks of experience, expertise, authoritativeness and trustworthiness (E-E-A-T). For legal and tax topics that affect money and life decisions, Google pays particular attention to whether a text visibly comes from someone with expert knowledge. For professional firms this is an advantage they only need to show:
Author details on every article
- Name and professional title of the author, as they are entitled to use it
- Link to their profile on the team page with photo and background
- For guest articles by staff: who carried out the professional review
- Publication and update date
- Sources: the statute, judgment or official information the article is based on
A realistic rhythm and multiple use
Many firm blogs start with three articles in the first month and end in the fourth. Plan instead for what you can manage permanently alongside your day-to-day work: for a small firm, one thorough article a month is a good rhythm, and one article per quarter is better than an abandoned blog. Set down your topics six months in advance, and place tax and deadline topics in the months when people search for them.
One article can be used several times. The short answer becomes a section in the client newsletter, a summary with a link becomes a post on LinkedIn, and the most frequent questions become a talk at a start-up initiative or in the community hall. Always refer back to the article on your website: that is where the maintained version is, and that is where enquiries come from.

AI texts: a tool, not an author
AI tools help with outlining, shortening and rewording into plain language. As authors they are not fit for legal and tax questions: they invent sections of statutes and case numbers, mix up Austrian and German law and reproduce outdated amounts, all in a convincing tone. Google assesses content by its quality, not by how it was produced. However, Google treats texts generated at scale, mainly intended to capture search queries, as spam.
- Check every legal basis, every judgment and every amount against the primary source
- Do not enter any client data into public AI tools, not even for an “example”
- Revise the text so that it shows your experience and your language
- Professional responsibility remains with the person named as author
How AI assistants describe your firm today, and whether they use your articles in doing so, can be tested with the AI preview. More on this in the guide to visibility in AI search.
A website with room for your expert articles
Our firm websites come with a guides section with dates, author details and links to your practice areas, plus a matching imprint. Request a free preview.
A no-obligation preview of how your firm website could look with us.
Sources
- Google Search Central – Creating helpful, reliable, people-first content
- Google Search Central – Google Search's guidance about AI-generated content
- Google Search Central – Spam policies
- Google Search Central – Publication dates in Google Search
- Google Search Central – Article structured data
- Google Search Central – Crawlable links and anchor text
- Medienstaatsvertrag § 18 (information obligations)
- RIS – Mediengesetz § 25 (disclosure)



